The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt, V) → U12(isNeList(activate(V)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U22(tt, V2) → U23(isList(activate(V2)))
U23(tt) → tt
U31(tt, V) → U32(isQid(activate(V)))
U32(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V1, V2) → U42(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U42(tt, V2) → U43(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U43(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V1, V2) → U52(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U52(tt, V2) → U53(isList(activate(V2)))
U53(tt) → tt
U61(tt, V) → U62(isQid(activate(V)))
U62(tt) → tt
U71(tt, V) → U72(isNePal(activate(V)))
U72(tt) → tt
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isList(V) → U11(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V))
isNePal(n____(I, __(P, I))) → and(and(isQid(activate(I)), n__isPalListKind(activate(I))), n__and(isPal(activate(P)), n__isPalListKind(activate(P))))
isPal(V) → U71(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isPalListKind(n__a) → tt
isPalListKind(n__e) → tt
isPalListKind(n__i) → tt
isPalListKind(n__nil) → tt
isPalListKind(n__o) → tt
isPalListKind(n__u) → tt
isPalListKind(n____(V1, V2)) → and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2)))
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
isPalListKind(X) → n__isPalListKind(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(X1, X2)
activate(n__isPalListKind(X)) → isPalListKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
isPalListKind(n____(n__isPalListKind(X194653_0), V2)) →⁺ and(isPalListKind(isPalListKind(X194653_0)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2)))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0,0].
The pumping substitution is [X194653_0 / n____(n__isPalListKind(X194653_0), V2)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)